Greg Fish joins to explain why climate coverage keeps escalating into panic, and the reason has less to do with the planet than with what gets clicks in the first place. What he describes about how algorithms shape article titles changes how the whole conversation reads.
A large international study tested two different ways of talking to people about climate change, and the results point to something counterintuitive about which approach actually gets people to act. Greg walks through what separated the group that felt hopeless from the group that didn’t.
By the end, Greg draws a distinction that reframes the entire debate, separating the real problem from something people often mistake it for.
Topics: Greg Fish, climate change, media panic, misinformation, sustainability
GUEST: Greg Fish | cyberpunksurvivalguide.com
Originally aired on2026-08-26
