Plane crash conspiracies can feel convincing when a frightening video meets an already uneasy world. Nathan Radke of the Uncover Up Podcast helps you recognise how separate events can start to look connected before the evidence establishes a link.
Nearby air defences become part of an online explanation. But what would have to be technically possible for that explanation to hold? Nathan identifies a specific detail to check before treating proximity as proof.
The same urge to connect events can pull emergency-preparedness messages and new technology into the story. How do you keep asking questions while leaving room for an answer you don’t yet have? There’s a distinction here between a possible explanation and knowing what happened.
Topics: plane crash conspiracies, conspiracy thinking, technical evidence, uncertainty, emergency-preparedness rumours
GUEST: Nathan Radke | https://www.amazon.ca/Uncover-Up-Think-Clearly-Conspiracies/dp/1770418873 | @uncoverup
Originally aired on2026-11-02
