Urban legends can sit in your memory for decades without ever looking suspicious. Nathan Radke uses the Phil Collins story you may have heard as a kid to give you a question that exposes what a familiar tale leaves out.
One version is simple. Another adds a bridge, a concert and a perfectly timed reveal. Why does adding detail make a story easier to believe, even as it gives you more to test? The answer says something about which stories survive being retold.
Then consider the claim that Paul McCartney was replaced. A clue in a song may sound persuasive until you ask what everyone around him would have needed to do. How many people would have to play along before the story collapses under its own weight?
Topics: urban legends, Phil Collins, Paul McCartney, celebrity rumours, critical thinking
GUEST: Nathan Radke | https://www.amazon.ca/Uncover-Up-Think-Clearly-Conspiracies/dp/1770418873
Originally aired on2026-09-23
